<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology and Social Addiction &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anasrifai.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anasrifai.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:58:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>VirtualBox VS Parallels Desktop on MacBooks</title>
		<link>http://www.anasrifai.com/uncategorized/virtualbox-vs-parallels-desktop-on-macbooks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anasrifai.com/uncategorized/virtualbox-vs-parallels-desktop-on-macbooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anasrifai.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A simple study on battery performance when running multiple operating systems on a MacBook Pro using VirtualBox vs. Parallels Desktop for Mac.

VirtualBox is a great product and it is free.  Before I upgraded my copy of Parallels 3 to Parallels Desktop 4 for Mac, I decided to give VirtualBox a shot and see what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A simple study on battery performance when running multiple operating systems on a MacBook Pro using VirtualBox vs. Parallels Desktop for Mac.<br />
<span id="more-19"></span><br />
VirtualBox is a great product and it is free.  Before I upgraded my copy of Parallels 3 to Parallels Desktop 4 for Mac, I decided to give VirtualBox a shot and see what this free virtualization platform is all about.</p>
<p>VirtualBox preformed very well, it took some minor work to get my os x partitions mapped, nevertheless, it worked perfectly and I was able to play video clips from my hard drive and online videos without a glitch.</p>
<p>One issue that bugged me about Parallels Desktop 3.0 was the heavy CPU load I experienced when running windows even when no windows applications are launched.  VirtualBox had a much lower CPU load but still it was peaking at about 10% which is acceptable, however, I was looking for a much lower CPU load due to the fact that I&#8217;m forced to run Windows XP for hours at a time using my MacBook Pro while powered through the battery.  Lower CPU load will eventually give my laptop longer battery life.</p>
<p>Not very happy with the CPU load, I upgraded to Parallels Desktop 4.0 for Mac and to my surprise the upgrade was worth it. Parallels has finally managed to move this product from a beta like application to the best virtualization platform I&#8217;ve ever used.  My peak CPU usage while Windows XP is active in the background moved down to an average of 1% and that increased my battery discharge time by 56 minutes and one could imagine how happy I am with the results.</p>
<p>If you need virtualization on your portable Mac and you use your battery extensively then Parallels Desktop 4.0 for Mac is the Ultimate choice.  Otherwise, I&#8217;m really a fan of VirtualBox and I believe that with time, VirtualBox is going to deliver a product comparable to the current version of Parallels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anasrifai.com/uncategorized/virtualbox-vs-parallels-desktop-on-macbooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
